OKRs for multinationals. One rhythm, many markets.
Different countries, languages, regulators and ways of working. The organisations that make OKRs work across borders agree what must be common and let everything else stay local.
None of these is a framework problem. All of them are people problems.
The nuances, the personalities, the detractors and the advocates.
Every enterprise implementation has the same cast. Managing them well is most of the job, and it's the part that can't be learned from a book.
The detractor with the best objection
Often the most experienced person in the room. We bring the objection out early and use it to make the system better, so they end up defending it.
The advocate who wants to go faster
Enthusiasm is precious and easy to burn. We give advocates a role, not a mandate, so they pull people in rather than push them away.
The leader defending what works
Usually right about something. We name what their team does best before asking them to change anything else.
The quiet majority, watching
They decide whether it sticks, by watching what happens to the first team through. We sequence for what that teaches.
Method can be written down. Navigating this can't. It's what ten years in the room with leadership teams gives you.
Q&A
How do OKRs work across countries? +
Agree what has to be common: how a goal is written, the review rhythm, and the measures that read across. Leave the rest to each country, including the language teams use day to day.
Should regions set their own OKRs? +
Yes, against a few company objectives. Regions know their markets; the company needs to see how they contribute. Aligned, not cascaded.
How do you handle time zones and languages? +
Design the cadence for the whole map, not head office. Written check-ins and key result narratives travel better than meetings, and they give leadership the same picture from every region.
We'll show you how it works and share case studies.
Then you decide.
Book a meeting →