// client case study · insuretech

A Series C insuretech went from three company objectives and nine key results to one and three, in a single quarter.

Matt Roberts
By Matt Roberts, co-founder, ZOKRI
Strategy & OKR consultant

A fast-scaling insuretech, fresh from a significant Series C and expanding internationally, was losing delivery pace as it grew; over one quarter we refocused its OKRs from three company objectives and nine key results to one objective and three, and fixed the metric foundation underneath.

3→1
company objectives
9→3
company key results
1
source of truth for metrics

Context

The company had recently closed a significant Series C, was recruiting hard, and was expanding internationally. After a challenging quarter with OKRs, the leadership wanted a smoother, more focused next quarter, one that held pace and alignment through rapid growth. The CEO had noticed both delivery pace and innovation falling as the organisation scaled.

The problem we found

Interviews across the senior leadership team and the wider organisation revealed a rollout weak on fundamentals. The critical issue: OKRs were being used as a performance-management system, which was driving misalignment and sandbagging. The OKRs themselves were generic and did not reflect the strategy.

What we did

We ran an education session with the leadership team on why OKRs and performance management must stay separate, then analysed the current OKRs against the strategy. A series of leadership working sessions drilled into the strategy so the OKRs reflected the critical hypotheses being tested, producing a clearer strategic narrative that was easier to update as the organisation learned.

Support included scheduled in-cycle and ad-hoc leadership meetings, plan development, comms support, and coaching across the organisation over Slack and Zoom, plus training and coaching of multiple product teams across geographies.

// results
Company level moved from three objectives and nine key results to one objective and three key results.
Stopped using OKRs at the individual level, ending the performance-management conflict.
Set OKRs at business-unit level with a pragmatic view below: most teams set OKRs, some connected directly to higher-level OKRs and identified leading metrics that became a dashboard.
Established a single source of truth for metric definitions and the connection between leading and lagging metrics, resolving a problem the client did not know was holding them back, called out as one of the engagement’s most critical outcomes.
The revised narrative landed extremely positively across the organisation.

Why it worked

Senior leadership commitment made the difference: leaders went first, created a psychologically safe environment, and were willing to unlearn behaviours that no longer worked. Focus followed from that, not the other way round.

// concepts this proves
OKRs and Compensation →Target Setting →Wildly Important Focus →Strategic Cross-functional OKRs →Metric Trees →Leading and Lagging Indicators →Aligned, Not Cascaded →

Sector-anonymised at the client's request. Figures are the client's own; no numbers have been added. Written by Matt Roberts.

Matt Roberts, ZOKRI co-founder and strategy and OKR consultant
// about the author
Matt Roberts, co-founder, ZOKRI

A UK-based strategy and OKR consultant and two-time SaaS founder with a venture-backed exit, Matt turns strategy into execution for teams scaling from tens to thousands. He co-founded ZOKRI in 2018, having previously co-founded Linkdex, a venture-backed enterprise SaaS platform he led to a trade sale.

Read Matt's profile →Book Matt →
// could this be your quarter?

If your OKRs have quietly become a performance-management system, we can separate them, refocus on the few that matter, and fix the metric foundation, usually inside a quarter.

Meet Us →How OKR consulting works